Sunday, May 17, 2009

Beethoven Du Dun Du Dun Du Dun Dun

Proposals "staggering"

Apart from wishful thinking in general, we subscribe unanimously disagreed vis-à-vis the bulk of the report's proposals Auclaire. For example, stress analysis and some proposals which seemed absurd:

the posting of all educational documents of schooling arrangements particularly in view of the doubling of the workforce;

striking federations cine-clubs and their transformation into counseling agencies;
the will of a more-movies "that would mean the opening of the recommendation" research "and enlargement of catalogs of educational measures on the grounds that there would not enough children affected by the devices;
  • increasing calls for tenders to open without a net field of visual education to private providers. In this regard, the structures that support Smugglers images are already in several places, will compete;
  • the evolution of the CCRA - for regional development of cinema - to missions outreach and coordination mechanisms for visual education.
  • We denounce the neoliberal conception that underlies a number of these proposals
, especially in the competition between operators for devices of image education and the opening film catalogs for teachers can pick them based on their knowledge of the movie title or appropriate to their discipline.
  • Moreover, it seems that the foundation of the three devices is denied by the school report, threaten what makes our eyes philosophy, c
  • that is to say "choice" by the competent committees of films, and the implementation methods of teaching appropriate accompaniments
(specific documents, thoughtful, designed, made and given to teachers and students, for each film viewing).
  • We reject a design that would reduce us to nothing more than "
prescribers of a wider range of cultural
.


***
The fourth workshop was followed by a lengthy exchange on engaging each other, the future of the mobilization and movement, and its future organization .




.




0 comments:

Post a Comment