Introduction: why we () are there 
 
 A year after the call for mobilization of St. Andre des Arts, the gloomy outlook that lay ahead at the start of 2008 have come true: the state continues gradually to disengage from the cultural sector. Succeeding in a first set of responses to declining public funding of cultural activities, these general statements mark the entrance into a second phase: it is now to strengthen the collective voice to bring out a unified and structured players in the field and represent a driving force in the debate on cultural policies. The finding 
 
 first - we might say crucial - that crosses and guide the exchange of four workshops set up in January by the collective, like a breadcrumb is  the absence of a negative definition of cultural activity 
. Indeed, the cultural action is ill-defined concept - perhaps simply undefined - which covers such a multiplicity of actions infringed on an area so extensive that a fine understanding of its diversity and its national , regional or local is thereby impeded. In practice, and by nature, cultural activities developed locally. Hypothesis: This misunderstand-induced growth primarily a failure to take into account at their respective cultural policies by the state and the CNC - Centre National  cinematography - 
 and by many communities. Second, this failure led the state and CNC 
 gradually diverting cultural activity of its intrinsic nature by introducing concepts  
0 comments:
Post a Comment